Skip to main content
TTrialFinderData
TrialFinderData is for informational purposes only and does not provide medical advice. Always talk to your doctor.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia Refractory Clinical Trials

4 recruiting trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Refractory. Eligibility criteria explained in plain English.

Important: This information is not medical advice. Talk to your doctor about whether a clinical trial is right for you.
4
Total Trials
4
Recruiting Now
0
Phase 3 Trials
4
Sponsors

Recruiting Trials

Clinical trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, maintained by the National Library of Medicine. Always consult your doctor before considering any clinical trial.

RECRUITINGPhase 1NCT05506332

Treatment With ABT-199 (Venetoclax) and Purine Analogues in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Non-commercial, open-label interventional phase Ib study to assess the effectivity of the combination of venetoclax and 6-mercaptopurine in patients with relapsed or refractory...

Sponsor: University Hospital, AntwerpEnrolling: 102 locations
RECRUITINGPhase 1NCT06372717

A Study to Investigate APL-4098 Alone and in Combination in Adults With AML or MDS

This is an open-label, Phase 1 study to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of APL-4098 alone, and in combination with azacitidine, and in combination with...

Sponsor: Apollo Therapeutics LtdEnrolling: 1007 locations
RECRUITINGNCT06459024

Master Framework For Relapse or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

This is an observational (non-interventional), prospective, cohort study that will collects data from patients diagnosed with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia...

Sponsor: Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori IRST S.r.l. IRCCSEnrolling: 400020 locations
RECRUITINGPhase 1NCT05317403

Venetoclax to Augment Epigenetic Modification and Chemotherapy

The investigator is testing the addition of venetoclax to 5-azacitidine and vorinostat followed by standard chemotherapy to enhance treatment response in AML patients.

Sponsor: Medical College of WisconsinEnrolling: 401 location

Frequently Asked Questions

There are currently 4 clinical trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Refractory, with 4 actively recruiting participants. These include trials across all phases from early-stage Phase 1 to late-stage Phase 3.

To join a clinical trial for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Refractory, review the eligibility criteria on the trial detail pages, then talk to your doctor about whether a trial is right for you. Your doctor can help you evaluate the potential benefits and risks.

Phase 3 trials are large-scale studies that test whether a treatment is effective and monitor side effects. There are 0 Phase 3 trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Refractory, representing treatments closest to potential FDA approval.

Clinical trials follow strict safety protocols overseen by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and the FDA. Participants are monitored closely and can withdraw at any time. Always discuss risks and benefits with your healthcare provider before enrolling.

Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA
Last updated:

Trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov API. This site does not provide medical advice, always talk to your doctor about clinical trial participation.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within active and historical clinical trials. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.