Age-related Macular Degeneration (armd) Clinical Trials
2 recruiting trials for Age-related Macular Degeneration (armd). Eligibility criteria explained in plain English.
Recruiting Trials
Clinical trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, maintained by the National Library of Medicine. Always consult your doctor before considering any clinical trial.
Switching to Aflibercept 8mg in Patients Showing Limited Response to Previous Treatment
The treatment landscape for neovascular AMD has evolved with various anti-VEGF agents since 2006. Ranibizumab initially led the way, but its limited efficacy in reducing retinal...
A Phase 1 Study of ABF-101 in Single- and Multiple-Ascending Doses
This is a Phase 1 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, and PD of ABF-101 in healthy participants and participants with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Explore Other Conditions
Frequently Asked Questions
There are currently 2 clinical trials for Age-related Macular Degeneration (armd), with 2 actively recruiting participants. These include trials across all phases from early-stage Phase 1 to late-stage Phase 3.
To join a clinical trial for Age-related Macular Degeneration (armd), review the eligibility criteria on the trial detail pages, then talk to your doctor about whether a trial is right for you. Your doctor can help you evaluate the potential benefits and risks.
Phase 3 trials are large-scale studies that test whether a treatment is effective and monitor side effects. There are 0 Phase 3 trials for Age-related Macular Degeneration (armd), representing treatments closest to potential FDA approval.
Clinical trials follow strict safety protocols overseen by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and the FDA. Participants are monitored closely and can withdraw at any time. Always discuss risks and benefits with your healthcare provider before enrolling.
Trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov API. This site does not provide medical advice, always talk to your doctor about clinical trial participation.
The this entity record above pulls directly from the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. clinical trials and research registries distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within active and historical clinical trials. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.