Dermatomyositis Clinical Trials
8 recruiting trials for Dermatomyositis. Eligibility criteria explained in plain English.
Recruiting Trials
Clinical trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, maintained by the National Library of Medicine. Always consult your doctor before considering any clinical trial.
Home Based Clinical Management of Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Rheumatic Diseases
The RMD-mILDer trial is a home monitoring strategy trial aiming to improve management of interstitial lung disease related to rheumatic diseases applying eHealth technology. It...
Rheumatology Patient Registry and Biorepository
To facilitate clinical, basic science, and translational research projects involving the study of rheumatic diseases.
CAR-T Cells in Systemic B Cell Mediated Autoimmune Disease
The investigational product is designed to effectively combat B cells in patients with autoimmune diseases. Autologous T cells enriched with CD4/CD8 are genetically engineered...
Subcutaneous Injection of Sodium Thiosulfate for Ectopic Calcifications or Ossifications. A Pilot Study
Ectopic soft tissue calcifications or ossifications can complicate the course of numerous diseases; most of them are rare or very rare. Even if the clinical, radiological and...
Anti-CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Systemic Autoimmune Diseases
The CATARSIS study explores the use of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy as a novel approach for treating refractory systemic autoimmune diseases, specifically SLE, SSc, DM/PM, and...
Intralesional Injection of STS in Treatment of Calcinosis
The specific objective of this study is to perform a small, open-label study to assess the safety and efficacy of intralesional, subcutaneous injection of STS on calcinosis...
Testing an Immunotherapy Anti-cancer Drug, Nivolumab, for Advanced Cancers in Patients With Autoimmune Disorders,...
This phase Ib trial studies the side effects of nivolumab and to see how well it works alone and in combination with other treatments, such as ipilimumab, cabozantinib, platinum...
A Long-Term Follow-Up Study for Participants Previously Treated With KYV-101
The purpose of this long-term follow-up (LTFU) study is to collect delayed adverse events (AEs) and understand the persistence of KYV-101 (autologous CAR T cell product;...
Explore Other Conditions
Frequently Asked Questions
There are currently 8 clinical trials for Dermatomyositis, with 8 actively recruiting participants. These include trials across all phases from early-stage Phase 1 to late-stage Phase 3.
To join a clinical trial for Dermatomyositis, review the eligibility criteria on the trial detail pages, then talk to your doctor about whether a trial is right for you. Your doctor can help you evaluate the potential benefits and risks.
Phase 3 trials are large-scale studies that test whether a treatment is effective and monitor side effects. There are 0 Phase 3 trials for Dermatomyositis, representing treatments closest to potential FDA approval.
Clinical trials follow strict safety protocols overseen by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and the FDA. Participants are monitored closely and can withdraw at any time. Always discuss risks and benefits with your healthcare provider before enrolling.
Trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov API. This site does not provide medical advice, always talk to your doctor about clinical trial participation.
The this entity record above pulls directly from the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. clinical trials and research registries distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within active and historical clinical trials with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.