Intestinal Malabsorption Clinical Trials
2 recruiting trials for Intestinal Malabsorption. Eligibility criteria explained in plain English.
Recruiting Trials
Clinical trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, maintained by the National Library of Medicine. Always consult your doctor before considering any clinical trial.
Efficacy and Safety of ELGN-2112 on Intestinal Malabsorption in Preterm Infants
The study will evaluate the effect of ELGN-2112 on intestinal malabsorption in preterm infants.
Assess the Safety of ELGN-2112 in Preterm Infants Born Under 26 Weeks GA and IUGR Infants Born 26-32 Weeks GA
To compare the safety of treatment with ELGN-2112 to placebo in preterm infants born less than 26 weeks GA and IUGR infants\<3rd percentile\* born at 26-32 weeks GA.
Explore Other Conditions
Frequently Asked Questions
There are currently 2 clinical trials for Intestinal Malabsorption, with 2 actively recruiting participants. These include trials across all phases from early-stage Phase 1 to late-stage Phase 3.
To join a clinical trial for Intestinal Malabsorption, review the eligibility criteria on the trial detail pages, then talk to your doctor about whether a trial is right for you. Your doctor can help you evaluate the potential benefits and risks.
Phase 3 trials are large-scale studies that test whether a treatment is effective and monitor side effects. There are 1 Phase 3 trials for Intestinal Malabsorption, representing treatments closest to potential FDA approval.
Clinical trials follow strict safety protocols overseen by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and the FDA. Participants are monitored closely and can withdraw at any time. Always discuss risks and benefits with your healthcare provider before enrolling.
Trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov API. This site does not provide medical advice, always talk to your doctor about clinical trial participation.
The this entity record above pulls directly from the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. clinical trials and research registries distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within active and historical clinical trials with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.