Skip to main content
TTrialFinderData
TrialFinderData is for informational purposes only and does not provide medical advice. Always talk to your doctor.

Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials

4 recruiting trials for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Eligibility criteria explained in plain English.

Important: This information is not medical advice. Talk to your doctor about whether a clinical trial is right for you.
4
Total Trials
4
Recruiting Now
0
Phase 3 Trials
3
Sponsors

Recruiting Trials

Clinical trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, maintained by the National Library of Medicine. Always consult your doctor before considering any clinical trial.

RECRUITINGPhase 1 / Phase 2NCT06617793

An Open-label Study to Assess the Safety, Efficacy, and Cellular Kinetics of YTB323 in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

This is an open-label, multi-center, non-confirmatory study to assess the safety, efficacy, and cellular kinetics of YTB323 in approximately 28 participants with Relapsing...

Sponsor: Novartis PharmaceuticalsEnrolling: 2818 locations
RECRUITINGPhase 4NCT07483450

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Ocrelizumab in Participants With...

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of ocrelizumab in participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and to characterize the ocrelizumab...

Sponsor: Hoffmann-La RocheEnrolling: 6017 locations
RECRUITINGNCT05809986

Ofatumumab in Portuguese Multiple Sclerosis Patients - an Observational Study

This non-interventional study will compare the effect of Ofatumumab treatment between patients that began Ofatumumab within the 3 years after Multiple Sclerosis diagnosis and...

Sponsor: Novartis PharmaceuticalsEnrolling: 17410 locations
RECRUITINGPhase 4NCT06529406

Prospective Evaluation of Sequencing From antiCD-20 Therapies to Ozanimod

A multi-center pilot study to evaluate safety and efficacy of ozanimod as de-escalation therapy in clinically stable MS patients previously treated with anti-CD20 therapy.

Sponsor: University of Colorado, DenverEnrolling: 1003 locations

Frequently Asked Questions

There are currently 4 clinical trials for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis, with 4 actively recruiting participants. These include trials across all phases from early-stage Phase 1 to late-stage Phase 3.

To join a clinical trial for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis, review the eligibility criteria on the trial detail pages, then talk to your doctor about whether a trial is right for you. Your doctor can help you evaluate the potential benefits and risks.

Phase 3 trials are large-scale studies that test whether a treatment is effective and monitor side effects. There are 0 Phase 3 trials for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis, representing treatments closest to potential FDA approval.

Clinical trials follow strict safety protocols overseen by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and the FDA. Participants are monitored closely and can withdraw at any time. Always discuss risks and benefits with your healthcare provider before enrolling.

Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA
Last updated:

Trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov API. This site does not provide medical advice, always talk to your doctor about clinical trial participation.

this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. clinical trials and research registries dataset. The detail above comes directly from the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across active and historical clinical trials.

The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within active and historical clinical trials with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.