Skip to main content
TTrialFinderData
TrialFinderData is for informational purposes only and does not provide medical advice. Always talk to your doctor.

Scleroderma, Systemic Clinical Trials

5 recruiting trials for Scleroderma, Systemic. Eligibility criteria explained in plain English.

Important: This information is not medical advice. Talk to your doctor about whether a clinical trial is right for you.
5
Total Trials
5
Recruiting Now
0
Phase 3 Trials
5
Sponsors

Recruiting Trials

Clinical trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, maintained by the National Library of Medicine. Always consult your doctor before considering any clinical trial.

RECRUITINGPhase 2 / Phase 3NCT05878717

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab in Adults With Systemic Sclerosis Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

This study investigates the efficacy and safety of belimumab compared to placebo, in addition to standard therapy, for the treatment of participants with systemic sclerosis...

Sponsor: GlaxoSmithKlineEnrolling: 30020 locations
RECRUITINGNCT04319120

Pilot Study of Description of Cicatrisation Rates of Digital Ulcers in Systemic Scleroderma

To make an updated inventory of digital ulcer care protocols in scleroderma patients and to specify the French data on monthly healing rates and local care with patients in care...

Sponsor: University Hospital, LimogesEnrolling: 783 locations
RECRUITINGNCT06182293

Periodontal Microbiota in Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare and complex autoimmune disease. Although its etiology remains unknown, various environmental factors, including certain microorganisms, can...

Sponsor: University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceEnrolling: 301 location
RECRUITINGNCT06256575

Study of Diosmin for the Treatment of Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis

This study is performed to consider the safety and healing ability of diosmin in patients with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) and open sores on their fingers (digital ulcers)....

Sponsor: Primus PharmaceuticalsEnrolling: 455 locations
RECRUITINGNCT07345052

Western Sweden Systemic Sclerosis Project

The main aim of the project is to identify key-factors involved in the development and progression of Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), a chronic invalidating rheumatic disease...

Sponsor: Sahlgrenska University HospitalEnrolling: 1501 location

Frequently Asked Questions

There are currently 5 clinical trials for Scleroderma, Systemic, with 5 actively recruiting participants. These include trials across all phases from early-stage Phase 1 to late-stage Phase 3.

To join a clinical trial for Scleroderma, Systemic, review the eligibility criteria on the trial detail pages, then talk to your doctor about whether a trial is right for you. Your doctor can help you evaluate the potential benefits and risks.

Phase 3 trials are large-scale studies that test whether a treatment is effective and monitor side effects. There are 0 Phase 3 trials for Scleroderma, Systemic, representing treatments closest to potential FDA approval.

Clinical trials follow strict safety protocols overseen by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and the FDA. Participants are monitored closely and can withdraw at any time. Always discuss risks and benefits with your healthcare provider before enrolling.

Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA
Last updated:

Trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov API. This site does not provide medical advice, always talk to your doctor about clinical trial participation.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

Every number on this page links back to the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within active and historical clinical trials with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.