Updated May 2026 · ClinicalTrials.gov
Comparison of Two Strategies for Administering the R21-Matrix M Vaccine in a Context of Seasonal Malaria Transmission in Chad
Cluster Randomised Non-inferiority Trial Comparing Malaria Incidence When Implementing R21/Matrix-M Synchronized With Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention Distribution Versus R21/Matrix-M Given Routinely Through the EPI in Two Health Districts in Chad (CoSAV-R21)
Comparison of Two Strategies for Administering the R21-Matrix M Vaccine in a Context of Seasonal Malaria Transmission in Chad (NCT07038837) is a Phase 4 interventional studying Malaria Infection and Malaria Vaccines, sponsored by Epicentre. RECRUITING as of the most recent ClinicalTrials.gov update. Talk to your doctor before contacting the trial site.
About This Trial
This is a two-arm, cluster-randomised, phase IV trial conducted in Chad to assess the protective efficacy and impact in real-life conditions of a new strategy for administering the R21/MM malaria vaccine, synchronized within a seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) campaign, among children living in areas of high seasonal malaria transmission. In this study, a cluster is defined as the catchment area of a primary care health centre. In Chad, each catchment area is known as a 'zone of responsibility' (French: Zone de Responsibilité' \[ZR\]). Twenty-six (26) of the total 27 ZRs in the districts of Moïssala and Dembo will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 4-dose (3 primary doses + 1 booster) R21/MM schedule either (1) integrated into the routine EPI vaccination program (the "Routine" control arm), or (2) synchronized with an annual seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) campaign (the "Synchronized" intervention arm). Malaria incidence: R21/MM effectiveness will be assessed using the incidence of biologically confirmed clinical malaria (trial primary endpoint). The incidence of clinical malaria will be determined through enhanced surveillance of malaria cases in health centres and hospitals over a 17-month period (August 2025 - December 2026). Coverage surveys: Cross-sectional surveys (cluster sampling) will be carried out to measure R21/MM vaccine coverage, SMC coverage, coverage of other malaria prevention measures, and coverage of other EPI vaccines. Nested case-control study: A sub-sample of children admitted to Moïssala District Hospital with severe clinical malaria will be offered the opportunity to participate in a nested case-control study designed to estimate the individual protective efficacy of R21/MM against severe malaria. Aditionnaly, the INTEGREVAC ancillary study's objective is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of the synchronised vaccination strategy in the context of the ongoing COSAV-R21 trial, to inform policy decisions for the effective deployment of malaria vaccines in SMC implementation areas. Methodology and planned work: (i) A qualitative study using in-depth interviews (IDIs) and group discussions with key stakeholders at the national, health facility, and community levels, including caregivers of children eligible for vaccination, in Chad, at several points during the trial. We will explore stakeholders' and beneficiaries' perceptions and experiences of the synchronised SMC vaccination strategy (trial intervention arm) compared to age-based vaccine administration under the routine immunisation programme (trial control arm), as well as considerations for implementing these strategies. Interviews with healthcare providers, including those administering R21 and SMC, and community members will assess the feasibility of implementing the integrated vaccination strategy via SMC. (ii) An economic evaluation including a cost-effectiveness analysis and a nested equity analysis will be conducted. The economic evaluation will include a cost analysis to carefully identify and measure the additional costs associated with adding malaria vaccination to the EPI delivery platform and, separately, to the SMC delivery channel. Analysis of key cost drivers will enable us to identify potential efficiency savings, provide evidence for country funding requests (e.g., to GAVI and the Global Fund) and for the malaria vaccine strategy budgeting/planning process. Cost-effectiveness and equity analyses of each vaccine delivery strategy will provide evidence to help national programmes plan future malaria vaccine delivery and inform global guidance and on methods of delivering these vaccines, while providing valuable evidence on the real-world cost-effectiveness of malaria vaccination. (iii) Impact modelling will estimate the costs, impact, and cost-effectiveness of scaling up the intervention approach to the whole of Chad, under different temporal and spatial scenarios.
What Stage of Research Is This?
Phase 4 studies happen after a treatment has been approved by the FDA. They monitor long-term safety, real-world effectiveness, and any rare side effects that only emerge in larger populations over longer periods. Phase 4 results sometimes lead to label changes, additional warnings, or — rarely — withdrawal of approval.
This trial is currently recruiting participants. The sponsor has registered the study with ClinicalTrials.gov as actively enrolling, which means new applicants who meet the eligibility criteria can be considered for screening. Trial status can change between updates — confirm current recruiting status with the study contact before traveling for a screening visit.
Target enrollment of 70,000 participants makes this one of the larger Malaria Infection trials currently registered. Trials at this scale are typically global, run across many sites, and designed to generate the definitive evidence package for an FDA approval submission or a label expansion.
Who May Be Eligible (Plain English)
These are translations of the protocol\'s inclusion and exclusion criteria, simplified for patients and caregivers. The original clinical text appears below. Eligibility is ultimately confirmed by the trial site\'s screening process — this summary is a starting point for a conversation with your doctor, not a final determination.
Original Eligibility Criteria
View original clinical language
Treatments Being Tested
"Synchronised" arm (intervention)
Vaccines received together with CPS
Locations (1)
Trial sites listed on ClinicalTrials.gov for this study. Site activation status can vary — confirm with the specific site before traveling for a screening visit.
How to Talk to Your Doctor About This Trial
Bring the printable summary of this trial — including the NCT ID (NCT07038837), the sponsor (Epicentre), and the key eligibility criteria — to your next appointment. Your doctor can review the inclusion and exclusion criteria against your medical history, lab values, and current treatments to assess whether you are likely to qualify. They can also help you weigh whether trial participation makes sense alongside your existing care plan.
Useful questions to walk through together: What does the trial protocol require beyond standard care? How long is the active treatment phase, and how long is follow-up? Are there study visits at sites I can reach? Who pays for the trial-specific procedures, and who pays for standard-of-care portions? See our 25 questions to ask about clinical trials guide for a more complete checklist.
Authoritative Sources
The official record for this trial lives on ClinicalTrials.gov — the federal registry maintained by the National Library of Medicine at NIH. For background on how this trial fits into the FDA approval pathway, see the FDA drug approval process. For oncology-specific guidance for patients considering trials, the National Cancer Institute publishes patient-oriented overviews. International trial registries are aggregated by the WHO ICTRP.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the NCT07038837 clinical trial studying?
This is a two-arm, cluster-randomised, phase IV trial conducted in Chad to assess the protective efficacy and impact in real-life conditions of a new strategy for administering the R21/MM malaria vaccine, synchronized within a seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) campaign, among children living in areas of high seasonal malaria transmission. In this study, a cluster is defined as the catchment area of a primary care health centre. In Chad, each catchment area is known as a 'zone of responsibility' (French: Zone de Responsibilité' \[ZR\]). Twenty-six (26) of the total 27 ZRs in the district… The full protocol is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and includes the primary outcome measures, eligibility criteria, and study endpoints.
Who can participate in NCT07038837?
Eligibility for this trial depends on the specific inclusion and exclusion criteria set by the sponsor. The plain-English summary above translates the most important criteria into accessible language; the official clinical text is preserved in the collapsible section underneath. Whether you fit any specific trial is a medical decision your doctor needs to confirm — bring the trial information to your treating physician for a full review against your medical history.
How do I contact the trial site for NCT07038837?
Contact information registered with ClinicalTrials.gov is shown in the sidebar of this page. Before reaching out, confirm with your treating physician that this trial is appropriate for your situation. The trial site will then walk you through the screening process to determine final eligibility.
Is participating in a clinical trial safe?
Clinical trials in the United States are regulated by the FDA and overseen by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) that review the protocol for safety. Risk varies by trial — Phase 1 studies test new treatments in humans for the first time, while Phase 3 trials use treatments that have already passed earlier safety screening. The informed consent document for any specific trial details the known risks and what to expect. Discuss those risks with your physician before deciding whether to participate.
Where can I verify the data on this page?
Every detail on this page comes directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov API. Click "View on ClinicalTrials.gov" in the sidebar to see the official, unmodified record. The federal record is always authoritative; this page is a structured presentation with a plain-English eligibility translation. For background on how clinical trials are regulated, see the FDA drug approval process documentation.
How This Page Is Built
Every field on this page is pulled directly from the ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 — no estimates, no proxies. The plain-English eligibility translation is generated from the original protocol text and reviewed for fidelity to the underlying clinical criteria. The original clinical text remains visible in the collapsible section above so users and clinicians can verify the translation. Read the full methodology for the data pipeline and known limitations.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 record for NCT07038837. Maintained by the National Library of Medicine at NIH. Public domain. Cite as: "TrialFinderData. NCT07038837. Data: ClinicalTrials.gov."
Medical disclaimer: This page is informational, not medical advice. Talk to your doctor about whether a clinical trial is right for you.
Last updated 2026-05-08 · Data from ClinicalTrials.gov.