Open Angle Glaucoma Clinical Trials
9 recruiting trials for Open Angle Glaucoma. Eligibility criteria explained in plain English.
Recruiting Trials
Clinical trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, maintained by the National Library of Medicine. Always consult your doctor before considering any clinical trial.
Standalone iStent Infinite and iDose TR for Management of Moderate to Severe Open Angle Glaucoma
The Investigators will investigate the efficacy of combining the standalone iStent infinite and iDose that are minimally invasive surgical and drug depot options are a safe and...
MINIject Global Long-Term Follow-up Study
The study will assess the long-term (up to 5 years) safety and performance in patients with open-angle glaucoma uncontrolled by topical hypotensive medications who had previously...
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of ELIOS in Patients With Open-Angle Glaucoma Undergoing Cataract Surgery
The primary study objective is to compare the effectiveness of the combination of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant with ELIOS or competitor device in reducing IOP...
24-hour Effect of Rocklatan Compared With Latanoprost in Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Patients
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect on 24-hour IOP reduction of netarsudil-latanoprost fixed combination in one eye compared to latanoprost alone in the...
Inferonasal MIMS® Procedure: Long-Term Follow-Up Extension Study
A long-term (24 and 30 months) follow-up extension, prospective, non-interventional, open label study for data collection from subjects who underwent prior MIMS® inferonasal...
Efficacy of Simbrinza and Rocklatan vs Cosopt and Latanoprost
A randomized, multi-site, parallel-group, prospective study of patients who are adults with a diagnosis of mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG), currently on an on-label use...
Quality of Life After Glaucoma Surgery: Evaluating the Patient Perspective Across Surgical Options
Glaucoma surgery currently relies on a wide therapeutic arsenal, ranging from conventional filtering surgeries to minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). These techniques...
STAR-LIFE: a Post-market Registry on MINIject
As part of the post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF), this registry is developed to ensure real-world data collection on MINIject device.
Trabeculopuncture as Predictive Test for the Success of Ab Interno Trabeculectomy
The purpose of this study is to perform trabeculopuncture a test to determine the distal outflow tract function to predict the success of ab interno trabeculectomy.
Explore Other Conditions
Frequently Asked Questions
There are currently 9 clinical trials for Open Angle Glaucoma, with 9 actively recruiting participants. These include trials across all phases from early-stage Phase 1 to late-stage Phase 3.
To join a clinical trial for Open Angle Glaucoma, review the eligibility criteria on the trial detail pages, then talk to your doctor about whether a trial is right for you. Your doctor can help you evaluate the potential benefits and risks.
Phase 3 trials are large-scale studies that test whether a treatment is effective and monitor side effects. There are 0 Phase 3 trials for Open Angle Glaucoma, representing treatments closest to potential FDA approval.
Clinical trials follow strict safety protocols overseen by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and the FDA. Participants are monitored closely and can withdraw at any time. Always discuss risks and benefits with your healthcare provider before enrolling.
Trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov API. This site does not provide medical advice, always talk to your doctor about clinical trial participation.
The this entity record above pulls directly from the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. clinical trials and research registries distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within active and historical clinical trials. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.