Osteosarcoma Clinical Trials
16 recruiting trials for Osteosarcoma. Eligibility criteria explained in plain English.
Recruiting Trials
Clinical trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, maintained by the National Library of Medicine. Always consult your doctor before considering any clinical trial.
Study of CRX100 as Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Solid Malignancies
This clinical study is an open-label, Phase 1, dose-escalation study to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the drug product produced by Administering CRX100 alone...
PET-imaging of Two Vartumabs in Patients With Solid Tumors
VARTUTRACE is a first-in-human PET/CT molecular imaging study in patients with solid tumors. This study will investigate the biodistribution and pharmacology of two antibody...
Agnostic Therapy in Rare Solid Tumors
The ANTARES study is a phase II basket trial designed to evaluate the tissue-agnostic efficacy of the monoclonal anti-PD1 antibody, nivolumab, in patients with advanced or...
Silmitasertib (CX-4945) in Combination With Chemotherapy for Relapsed Refractory Solid Tumors
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the investigational drug, silmitasertib (a pill taken by mouth), in combination with FDA approved drugs for solid tumors. An...
A Phase 2 Pilot Study to Evaluate the Safety and the Anti-Tumour Activity of the Myc Inhibitor OMO-103 Administered...
This is an open-label, unicentric, single-arm Phase 2 pilot study to serve as a proof-of-concept of OMO-103 safety and activity in patients with advanced high-grade osteosarcoma....
Adherence to a Personalized Home Exercise Program in Patients With Bone Tumor Undergoing Lower Extremity Salvage Surgery
The objective of this study is to describe adherence to a personalised home exercise program in patients undergoing resection and reconstruction of lower limb for bone tumor and...
ARTEMIS-002: HS-20093 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Osteosarcoma and Other Sarcomas
HS-20093 is a fully humanized IgG1 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) which specifically binds to B7-H3, a target wildly expressed on solid tumor cells. This is a phase 2, open-label,...
Analysis of the Toxicity and Efficacy of Daily 1 vs 2 Beam Proton Therapy
Thanks to the intrinsic qualities of the proton beam, proton therapy will reduce adverse effects of irradiation. The Proteus®One is the latest generation of proton therapy...
Safety and Efficacy of DIT309 in Advanced Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas
This is a open-Label, dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety, tolerability and antitumor activity of DIT309 in subjects with advanced bone and soft tissue sarcomas.The study...
Efficacy of Regorafenib Combined With Best Supportive Care as Maintenance Treatment in High Grade Bone Sarcomas Patients
This is a multicenter phase II study concerning patients with high-grade bone sarcoma (HGBS) without complete remission after standard treatment at diagnosis or at relapse....
Losartan + Sunitinib in Treatment of Osteosarcoma
This study is a Phase 1/1b clinical trial that aims to determine the Maximally Tolerated Dose of Losartan and Sunitinib Combination Therapy. Patients will first be accrued to the...
Alpha/Beta T and B Cell Depletion With Zoledronic Acid for Solid Tumors
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation can cure patients with blood cancer and other underlying diseases. αβ-T cell and B cell depletion has been introduced to decrease GVHD and...
An Observational Study of Local Relapse After High Grade Osteosarcoma
multicenter retrospective and prospective study in patients with high-grade osteosarcoma
A Clinical Study on Oncolytic Virus Injection (R130) for the Treatment of Advanced Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors
9 participants are expected to be enrolled for this open，Single-armed clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the recombinant herpes simplex virus Ⅰ, R130 in...
Cabozantinib With Ifosfamide in Relapsed/Refractory Sarcomas
The purpose of this study is to better understand how safe and effective the drug cabozantinib in combination with high-dose ifosfamide is in the treatment of children and adults...
Study of CAR T-Cells Targeting the GD2 With IL-15+iCaspase9 for Relapsed/Refractory Neuroblastoma or...
The body has different ways of fighting infections and disease. No single way seems perfect for fighting cancer. This research study combines two different ways of fighting...
Explore Other Conditions
Frequently Asked Questions
There are currently 16 clinical trials for Osteosarcoma, with 16 actively recruiting participants. These include trials across all phases from early-stage Phase 1 to late-stage Phase 3.
To join a clinical trial for Osteosarcoma, review the eligibility criteria on the trial detail pages, then talk to your doctor about whether a trial is right for you. Your doctor can help you evaluate the potential benefits and risks.
Phase 3 trials are large-scale studies that test whether a treatment is effective and monitor side effects. There are 0 Phase 3 trials for Osteosarcoma, representing treatments closest to potential FDA approval.
Clinical trials follow strict safety protocols overseen by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and the FDA. Participants are monitored closely and can withdraw at any time. Always discuss risks and benefits with your healthcare provider before enrolling.
Trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov API. This site does not provide medical advice, always talk to your doctor about clinical trial participation.
The this entity record above pulls directly from the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. clinical trials and research registries distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.
Every number on this page links back to the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within active and historical clinical trials with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.