Skip to main content
TTrialFinderData
TrialFinderData is for informational purposes only and does not provide medical advice. Always talk to your doctor.

Severe Aortic Stenosis Clinical Trials

5 recruiting trials for Severe Aortic Stenosis. Eligibility criteria explained in plain English.

Important: This information is not medical advice. Talk to your doctor about whether a clinical trial is right for you.
5
Total Trials
5
Recruiting Now
0
Phase 3 Trials
5
Sponsors

Recruiting Trials

Clinical trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, maintained by the National Library of Medicine. Always consult your doctor before considering any clinical trial.

RECRUITINGNCT07193888

Navitor Japan Study

The Navitor Japan Study is designed to evaluate the safety and performance of the Navitor™ valve used in combination with the FlexNav™ delivery system in a contemporary,...

Sponsor: Abbott Medical DevicesEnrolling: 1001 location
RECRUITINGNCT06898086

Transfemoral TAVI With or Without Coronary Angiogram in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis (PURE TAVI)

This study will be conducted in patients with severe aortic stenosis who are referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). TAVI is the recommended treatment for...

Sponsor: Rede Optimus Hospitalar SAEnrolling: 62020 locations
RECRUITINGNCT06477042

Act on Quality of Life in Patients With aortIc Stenosis

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a degenerative process affecting the aortic valve that leads to sclerosis of the valve and limits its opening during cardiac contractions. The prognosis is...

Sponsor: Hospices Civils de LyonEnrolling: 2404 locations
RECRUITINGNCT07414342

Safety and Efficacy of the RENATUS® Transcatheter Aortic Valve System for the Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis

This study is a prospective, non-randomized, observational, post-market follow-up trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the RENATUS® Transcatheter Aortic Valve...

Sponsor: Beijing Balance Medical Technology Co., LtdEnrolling: 8004 locations
RECRUITINGNCT06136429

A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-arm Study to Evaluate a Transcatheter Aortic Valve System Safety and Efficacy for...

Trial Title: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm target value clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a transcatheter aortic valve system in the treatment of...

Sponsor: Pan XiangbinEnrolling: 1201 location

Frequently Asked Questions

There are currently 5 clinical trials for Severe Aortic Stenosis, with 5 actively recruiting participants. These include trials across all phases from early-stage Phase 1 to late-stage Phase 3.

To join a clinical trial for Severe Aortic Stenosis, review the eligibility criteria on the trial detail pages, then talk to your doctor about whether a trial is right for you. Your doctor can help you evaluate the potential benefits and risks.

Phase 3 trials are large-scale studies that test whether a treatment is effective and monitor side effects. There are 0 Phase 3 trials for Severe Aortic Stenosis, representing treatments closest to potential FDA approval.

Clinical trials follow strict safety protocols overseen by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and the FDA. Participants are monitored closely and can withdraw at any time. Always discuss risks and benefits with your healthcare provider before enrolling.

Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA
Last updated:

Trial data sourced from the ClinicalTrials.gov API. This site does not provide medical advice, always talk to your doctor about clinical trial participation.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

Every number on this page links back to the NIH ClinicalTrials.gov registry; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within active and historical clinical trials with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.